|
20 February 2002
EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
INTERIM PROCEDURES
INTERIM PROCEDURES
[See Scarborough v. Principi, 273 F.3d 1087 (Fed. Cir. 2001)]
1. Definitions
For the purpose of these interim procedures:
a. "Equal Access to Justice Act," or "EAJA," means
5 U.S.C. § 504, as amended;*
b. "Board" means the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals;
and
c. "Contract Disputes Act" means The Contract Disputes Act
of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613.
2. Scope of interim procedures
These interim procedures are intended to assist the parties in adjudication
of EAJA applications for award of fees and other expenses incurred in
connection with appeals of decisions made under 41 U.S.C. § 605
until such time as the Department of Defense by rule establishes uniform
procedures for the submission and consideration of EAJA applications.
3. Eligibility of applicants
a. To be eligible for an EAJA award, an applicant must be a proper
party appellant which has prevailed in a Contract Disputes Act appeal
before the Board and must be one of the following:
(1) An individual with a net worth of not more than $2 million;
(2) Any owner of an unincorporated business who has a net worth of
not more than $7 million and not more than 500 employees;
*Pub. L. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996).
(3) A charitable or other tax-exempt organization described in section
501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. § 501(c)(3))
with not more than 500 employees;
(4) Any other partnership, corporation, association, unit of local
government, or other organization with a net worth of not more than
$7 million and not more than 500 employees.
b. For the purpose of eligibility, the net worth and number of employees
of an applicant shall be determined as of the date the underlying Contract
Disputes Act appeal was filed with the Board.
c. The employees of an applicant include all persons under the applicant's
direction and control who regularly perform services for remuneration
for the applicant. Part-time employees shall be included on a proportional
basis.
d. The aggregate net worth and number of employees of the applicant
and all of its affiliates shall be used to determine eligibility. Any
individual, corporation, or other entity that directly or indirectly
controls or owns a majority of the voting shares or other interest of
the applicant or any corporation or other entity of which the applicant
directly or indirectly owns or controls a majority of the voting shares
or other interest will be considered an affiliate for purposes of these
procedures, unless the Board determines that such treatment would be
unjust and contrary to the purposes of the EAJA in light of the actual
relationship between the affiliated entities.
4. Standards of awards
a. A prevailing applicant shall receive an award of fees and expenses
incurred in connection with a Contract Disputes Act appeal, or in a
significant and discrete substantive portion of a Contract Disputes
Act appeal, unless the position of the Government over which the applicant
prevailed was substantially justified. The position of the Government
includes, in addition to the position taken by the Government in the
Contract Disputes Act appeal, the action or failure to act by the Government
upon which the Contract Disputes Act appeal was based.
b. An award may be reduced or denied if the applicant has unduly or
unreasonably protracted the Contract Disputes Act appeal or if special
circumstances make the award unjust.
5. Allowable fees and other expenses
a. Fees and other expenses must be reasonable. Awards usually will
be based upon the prevailing market rates for the kind and quality of
services furnished by attorneys, agents, and expert witnesses, even
if the services were made available without charge or at a reduced rate
to the applicant. Appellants appearing pro se in the Contract Disputes
Act appeal may not recover attorney's fees.
b. No award for the fee of an attorney or agent under these interim
procedures may exceed $125 per hour.* No expert witness shall be compensated
at a rate in excess of the highest rate of compensation for expert witnesses
paid by the agency involved. However, an award may also include the
reasonable expenses of the attorney, agent, or witness as a separate
item, when the attorney, agent, or witness ordinarily charge clients
separately for such expenses.
c. The reasonable cost of any study, analysis, engineering report,
test, project, or similar matter prepared on behalf of a party may be
awarded, to the extent that the study or other matter was necessary
in connection with the appeal and the charge for the service does not
exceed the prevailing rate for similar services.
6. Time for filing of applications
a. An application may be filed after an appellant has prevailed in
the Contract Disputes Act appeal, or in a significant and discrete substantive
portion of an appeal, but not later than 30 days after the disposition
of the appeal has become final. This statutory 30-day period cannot
be extended.
b. For the purposes of these interim procedures, the Board's disposition
of the Contract Disputes Act appeal becomes final on the date the Board's
disposition is no longer appealable.
*$75 per hour for appeals commenced before 29 March 1996.
c. If an application for fees and other expenses from an applicant who
has prevailed in a significant and discrete substantive portion of a
Contract Disputes Act appeal is filed prior to the Board's disposition
of that appeal becoming final, proceedings on the application will be
stayed pending the Board's disposition of the appeal becoming final.
7. Application requirements
a. Within 30 days of final disposition of the appeal, an EAJA applicant
must comply with each of the following:
(1) Show that the applicant is a prevailing party;
(2) Show that the applicant is eligible to receive an award (paragraphs
3 and 8 herein);
(3) Allege that the position of the Government was not substantially
justified; and
(4) Show the amount of fees and other expenses sought, including an
itemized statement thereof (paragraph 9 herein).
b. An original and one copy of the application and exhibits should
be filed with the Board. The applicant will forward one copy to the
Government.
c. When a complaint application has been timely filed, the Board,
in order to obtain more detailed information, may require supplementation
of one or more of the jurisdictional averments set out in paragraph
a. above.
8. Net worth exhibit
a. Each applicant must provide with its application a detailed Net
Worth Exhibit showing the net worth of the applicant and any affiliates,
as defined in paragraph 3 herein, when the Contract Disputes Act appeal
was filed. The exhibit may be in any form convenient to the applicant
that provides full disclosure of the assets, liabilities, and net worth
of each affiliate and that is sufficient to determine whether the applicant
has established eligibility under paragraph 3.
b. Ordinarily, the net worth exhibit will be included in the public
record of the proceedings. However, an applicant that objects to public
disclosure of information in any portion of the exhibit and believes
there are legal grounds for withholding it from disclosure may submit
that portion of the exhibit directly to the Board in a sealed envelope
labeled "Confidential Financial Information," accompanied
by a motion to withhold the information from public disclosure. The
motion shall describe the information sought to be withheld and explain,
in detail, why it falls within one or more of the specific exemptions
from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C.
552(b)(1)-(9), why public disclosure of the information would adversely
affect the applicant, and why disclosure is not required in the public
interest. The material in question shall be served on counsel representing
the agency against which the applicant seeks an award, but need not
be served on any other party to the proceedings. If the Board finds
that the information should not be withheld from disclosure, it shall
be placed in the public record of the proceedings. Otherwise, any request
to inspect or copy the exhibit shall be disposed of under established
procedures under the Freedom of Information Act.
9. Fees and other expenses exhibit
a. The application should be accompanied by a detailed Fees and Other
Expenses Exhibit fully documenting the fees and other expenses, including
the cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, project,
or similar matter, for which an award is sought. The date and a description
of all services rendered or costs incurred should be indicated. A separate
itemized statement should be submitted for each professional firm or
individual whose services are covered by the application showing the
hours spent in connection with the Contract Disputes Act appeal by each
individual, a description of the particular services performed by specific
date, the rate at which each fee has been computed, any expenses for
which reimbursement is sought, the total amount claimed, and the total
amount paid or payable by the applicant or by any other person or entity
for the services provided. The Board may require the applicant to provide
vouchers, receipts, or other substantiation for any expenses sought.
b. Where appellant has prevailed on only a significant and discrete
substantive portion of the Contract Disputes Act appeal, the application
should be limited to fees and expenses allocable to the portion of the
Contract Disputes Act appeal on which appellant prevailed.
10. Answer to application
a. Within 30 days after receipt by the Government of an application,
the Government may file an answer. Unless the Government requests an
extension of time for filing or files a statement of intent to negotiate
under paragraph b. below, failure to file an answer within the 30-day
period may be treated by the Board at its discretion as a general denial
to the application on behalf of the Government.
b. If the Government and the applicant believe that the matters raised
in the application can be resolved by mutual agreement, they may jointly
file a statement of intent to negotiate a settlement. Filing of this
statement shall extend the time for filing an answer for an additional
30 days. Further extensions may be requested by the parties.
c. The answer shall explain in detail any objections to the award
requested and identify the facts relied upon in support of the Government's
position. If the answer is based on factual allegations not contained
in the record of the underlying Contract Disputes Act appeal, the Government
may include supporting affidavits with the answer.
d. An original and two copies of the answer should be filed with the
Board. The Government will forward one copy to the applicant.
11. Reply
Within 15 days after receipt of an answer, the applicant may file
a reply. If the reply is based on any factual allegations not already
in the record of the underlying Contract Disputes Act appeal, the applicant
shall include supporting affidavits with the reply. An original and
two copies of the reply shall be filed with the Board. The applicant
will forward one copy to the Government.
12. Award proceedings
a. The Board may enter an order prescribing the procedure to be followed
or take such other action as may be deemed appropriate under the EAJA.
Further proceedings shall be held only when necessary for full and fair
resolution of the issues arising from the application.
b. A request that the Board order further proceedings under this paragraph
shall describe the disputed issues, explain why the additional proceedings
are deemed necessary to resolve the issues and specifically identify
any information sought and its relationship to the disputed issues.
c. Further proceedings shall not include evidentiary hearings or discovery
to determine whether the Government's position under the EAJA was substantially
justified. Absent good cause shown, evidentiary hearings will not be
conducted on other issues related to applications under the EAJA.
13. Evidence
a. Decisions on the merits.
When a Contract Disputes Act appeal is decided on the merits, the
record relating to whether the Government's position under the EAJA
was substantially justified will be limited to the record in the Contract
Disputes Act appeal. Evidence relevant to other issues in the award
proceeding may be submitted.
b. Other dispositions.
When a Contract Disputes Act appeal is settled on terms favorable
to the appellant, either party in proceedings under the EAJA may, for
good cause shown, supplement the record established in the Contract
Disputes Act appeal with affidavits and other supporting evidence relating
to whether the position of the agency was substantially justified or
other issues in the award proceeding.
14. Decision
Decisions under the EAJA will be rendered for the Board by the administrative
judge or a majority of the judges who would have participated in a motion
for reconsideration of the underlying Contract Disputes Act appeal.
The decision of the Board shall include written findings and conclusions
and the reason or basis thereof. The Board's decision on an application
for fees and other expenses under the EAJA shall be the final administrative
decision.
15. Motions for reconsideration
Either party may file a motion for reconsideration. Motions for reconsideration
must be filed within 30 days of receipt of the Board's EAJA decision.
16. Judicial review
Applicants may appeal the Board's EAJA decision as provided in 5 U.S.C.
§ 504(c)(2).
17. Payment of Awards
The Board's EAJA awards shall be paid by the contracting agency over
which the applicant prevailed in the underlying Contract Disputes Act
appeal. EAJA awards, however, may not be paid from the indefinite appropriation
established under 31 U.S.C.
§ 1304, or Judgment Fund.
|